"Historical Context upon every spiritual crime of idolatry and rejection of morality in society" (REVISED)

REVISED 12/16/2022 12am to 6am


Synopsis.

 From our perspective, a world without God and a world without order are often indistinguishable from each other. While themes of plagues, disaster, war events and judgements upon humanity are present in key areas of scripture, we here at CDCS want to highlight the need for context so people aren't arriving at a false characterization of Christ and His divinity in ancient times.

For example, our world-views of divine acts in segments from scriptures appear to conflict with the actual meaning of our final revelations of Jesus in the New Covenant. If unrelated areas which seem not connected with each other are actually pointing out the exact same thing. A life without God and a life without order are many times identical from the 'old' timeline, as we observe the 'new' timeline. Because of this, there is no significant distinction between the two timelines in regards to their respective existences. Only the instrumental cause of a superior covenant brings us to God apart from our own selves. If we were to say that everything that has ever existed either no longer exists or never was, then it would be impos­sible for us to know what has occurred in the history of our world. Yet the former was not built on better promises, the former generations set both the stage and need for it. It seems people still don’t accept the gospel and the Bible predicts things will get worse than they ever have been before. If you're shaken by ancient biblical events, the rest of those times of trouble are in the near future- and it's for the same causes and effect we've witnessed in ancient history, we will see the next wave in our time of Grace.

 

1. God’s redemptive plan exceeds the power of judgement, brokenness in society.

If we aren't certain how quickly one generation can erode another, then are we accountable for determining the likelihood of when God should step in and judge if He should act toward us at all? God’s redeeming plans surpass the power of human judgement. If we are unsure of how rapidly generations are falling away from God, are we bearing the burden of deciding whether God should take action toward us at any given moment? Thus questioning history’s tell-tales indicating the results of those judgements God made as unnecessary or unfair? Then are we responsible for judging ourselves? And all of God's judgements fall short of effective and our irrational misconduct for how they affect human life? What if His decisions apart from our understanding were steps to live in completeness, rather than rulings forcing us to try to be complete by something other than Himself altogether? Would it still effect our logic to think differently of God, or inspire logic of putting our foot on the right conclusion?

We're trying to help people understand why some things happened in history, even though they may seem unrelated. A lot has been written about Christian theology, but even when discussing Christian topics, we don't necessarily wish for readers to arrive at a false understanding of Jesus' Divinity in Ancient Times.
We need historical contextualization so that readers don't get misled by incorrect understanding of Jesus' divinity.

The Bible is not merely an encyclopedia of historical facts, but a collection of stories that have been passed down through the ages. The authors of these stories did not intend to write a comprehensive account of history; they wrote them with a particular purpose in mind: to communicate spiritual truths to their audience. In order to understand what was being communicated, we must first know who the intended audience was.

I am not saying that God does not have a plan. I am saying that He has a plan which includes us. We are part of His plan. But we do not know what His plan is from a human standpoint. We can only speculate. The Bible says that God knows the end from the beginning. This means that He knows what will happen before it happens. It also means that He knows what we will do before we do it. So why would He allow us to make mistakes? Why wouldn't He just correct them? Because He wants us to learn from them. That is why He allows us to experience pain. Pain teaches us lessons and helps us grow spiritually, though not in the sense we embrace harm as a virtue of character, but "how much can we handle or put up with until we make the choice to cry for intervention. Not a coping method to stay bogged down by uncomfortable circumstances, but to see God's perspective as we welcome God's way of living out His plan.

 

As a reverse skeptic: "It's true that God has purposes for us, but I'm just suggesting that He may not be interested in our lives. I'm not claiming that He has no plan for us; I'm just suggesting that we shouldn't expect Him to take an interest in our lives. I am not making any claims about His grand designs; I'm simply stating that He may not be concerned with whether we succeed or fail."

As a confident belief in Biblical studies, objectively:
 "but I am certain that God has a plan for everything that happens in our lives. And I know that He knows exactly how we feel. So I'm not concerned about my future because I depend on His love. And I'll keep trusting that He loves me no matter what happens next, but I do believe that there's something beyond this world's understanding of pain, in relating that battle of their view of God above pain, we're called to accept in order to galvanize an even stronger world-view of Jesus!" Real Bible study relies on it!

I have been thinking about this question and how it relates to the topic of this article. The answer is yes, I think that God does care about our lives. However, I don’t think that He expects us to live them perfectly since out realest, genuine responses to most things are unfavorable to most experiences on our human limits. So then does my response generally impair God's favorable acts toward me? So why try or put on a good effort? So what part of faith and trust am I missing then?

Our human side of New Covenant has far reaching facets into the work of Christ than we give God credit for.

• His plan exceeds the ability of evil to influence us; he wants to rescue us from ourselves through intervening with compassion. Whenever we recognize that we've turned our backs on Jesus, he wants to intervene in our lives to bring us back to himself. We must listen to the voice of pain so we won't miss out on the opportunity to be saved. There is a conscious living plan to rescue people who are suffering because they've been separated from Him through His appeals to them before the fury. To suspend the groundwork of the constant shame erupting from a course of false activity which we see as the first stage of a witness of judgement. He wants to intervene compassionately for the sorrowful hearts of many people who are rightly feeling as a result of ignoring Jesus' person when they thought about their relationship with Him. The roar of the hurt is bringing many into the danger zone, (the root of the separation anxiety) where they might not realize the source of their troubles He represents in our help before God. Some may even feel ashamed of themselves if they don't recognize that they're headed toward something that could be harmful. But God has given them a way out. He wants to step in and comfort them if they follow him with the promise we can find hope after great struggle.

 If I could connect the sovereignty of God, mercy and intervention that leads to a summary of God's outcome and report card of secular institutions all in the same sentence to explain some grim aspects of OLD COVENANT wouldn't I need to address why the New Covenant was needed afterward? Isn't that God's successive solution today for the world?